Log-in 

RE: O.T. USA Today asks Dubya-'Where were you in '72'? page 11

This is a discussion thread · 138 replies
1 5 6 7 8 9 10  12 13 14
Jeff Harper:
[nq:2]If I had missed your post, people would have thought ... you a PIECE OF with ZEROCREDIBILITY FROM HERE ON.[/nq]
[nq:1]Hopefully you feel the same about CBS and the DNC.[/nq]
You were not clever, moron.
Jeff Harper
Tampa, FL
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
JohnnyD:
[nq:1]you CREDIBILITY[/nq]
[nq:2]Hopefully you feel the same about CBS and the DNC.[/nq]
[nq:1]You were not clever, moron. Jeff Harper Tampa, FL[/nq]
You don't seem to have the same outrage against CBS. Wonder why?
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
Jeff Harper:
[nq:2]You were not clever, moron.[/nq]
[nq:1]You don't seem to have the same outrage against CBS. Wonder why?[/nq]
You are confused. I never said the documents were legitimate, in fact I said it looked as if they weren't. And I've voiced very little opinion about CBS.
Moron.
I see you are looking for "sponsors and backers for major tournaments." I'll be sure to let anyone who considers you a prospect, which I imagine is unlikely, know about your lack of ethics, low intelligence, and poor judgment.
Jeff Harper
Tampa, FL
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
JohnnyD:
[nq:2]You don't seem to have the same outrage against CBS. Wonder why?[/nq]
[nq:1]You are confused. I never said the documents were legitimate, in fact I said it looked as if they weren't. ... prospect, which I imagineis unlikely, know about your lack of ethics, low intelligence, and poor judgment. Jeff Harper Tampa, FL[/nq]
Are you this easy to put on tilt in a poker game?
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
Jeff Harper:
You don't know the definition of tilt, apparently. I'm making no mistake when I call you deceitful and stupid, John Davis.
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
Gary Carson:
[nq:1]You don't know the definition of tilt, apparently. I'm making no mistake when I call you deceitful and stupid, John Davis.[/nq]
Johnny is misguided. But he's not deceitful and he's far from stupid.

Gary Carson
http://garycarson.com
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
Gary Carson:
[nq:1]I was in risk of getting drafted and thought this would be a good alternative. I had no trouble getting in and didn't get any help.[/nq]
I didn't have any trouble getting in the Navy Reserve either, although it did require a two year active duty commitment and an ARI/GCT of 120 (more than was required for OCS). The Navy was able to be very picky, as was the National Guard. The difference with Bush was that he didn't have high apptitude exam scores. He had help.

Gary Carson
http://garycarson.com
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
da pickle:
"Jeff Harper"
Jeff, you have become totally hysterical ... all caps and everything. If someone says something that is not true about you, you really should be careful at just how strongly you defend yourself. There is a saying (and I am not sure I am remembering it exactly correctly) that says something like: He who defends himself, accuses himself. There is also the thought (and I could have this one wrong too): You need not defend yourself to your friends and you cannot defend yourself to your enemies.

So try and be a little more considerate of others and you will not be thought to be just-young, just-popping off or some other somewhat harsh names but not really so bad. As you mature, you will be handle people who call you real names ... like "liar." There are people that feel that "liar" is one of the worse names you can call them. It goes to their core being. They do not respond by typing in all capital letters, they actually hit you. So, my fatherly advice (and I know you are not my son, it is just figurative) is to be a little more circumspect in saying things about others and they might say fewer not-nice things about you.

Sorry to be so verbose, but that is just my style. I will say again, you seem like an articulate and smart young man. You do not seem to have the self control that I hope you develop to discuss (or even argue) with those with whom you disagree. You never have told us what business you work with or what you want to do in the future. Such questions help others understand "where you are coming from" and sometimes helps and sometimes hurts your credibility.
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
da pickle:
[nq:1]by don't think[/nq]
[nq:2]I think the correct assessment is that the left-wing media ... news outlets just reporting the news and letting us decide?[/nq]
[nq:1]I think the correct assessment is that neither the left-wing nor the moderate mainstream media thinks it's newsworthy. Jeff Harper Tampa, FL[/nq]
That is "an" assessment. If you believe it to be a good one, you should go with it. That "you" think it is the "correct" assessment does not, of course, make it accurate nor does it even seem to be true.
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
da pickle:
[nq:1]enough[/nq]
[nq:2]Good heavens, Jeff, my original link was to the WSJ.[/nq]
[nq:1]You linked an editorial, not an article.[/nq]
Sorry, Jeff, it was still the WSJ. The "source" was either legitimate or not. You apparently consider CBS to be a legitimate source. You can disagree with the information and say that the information seems to be incorrect or inaccurate, but to say that the source is not "mainstream" enough for you is ... I don't know ... silly.
This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.
Show more