[nq:1]I have documented over 200, [nq:2]I have documented over 200, [nq:1]just call

1 2 3

mb:

[nq:1]just call me the new RIVERLOSER on Pokerstars because i get bounced out of more SNGs on the river than ... hands (losses to club flushes): holding trip 5s- lost to 3s 5s when a spade fell on the river. 3.[/nq]^ next hand Q Q all-in- lost to 3s 6s when a spade fell on the river for
[nq:1]a flush. 4. top pair Ace/top kicker King- lost to A 10, guy hit a 7 to Jack straight on ... these are just some of them. it definitely has me wondering why i'm losing so many hands on the river.[/nq]
If you just looking at the hands where you were busted out of a tourney then your sample is biased. A good player will usually be busted out on a good hand. But this same (or similar) good hand has probably won a few confrontations before being busted.
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Mr. Poker Toad:

[nq:1]I have documented over 200 all in bets at PokerStars.[/nq]
There are some articles about poker site integrity at the Online Poker FAQ:

Can you trust the shuffle?
http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/fair-shuffle.html

Conspiracy theories
http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/conspiracy.html

Player cheating
http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/cheating.html
Toad
Online Poker FAQ - http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Gary Carson:

[nq:2]I have documented over 200 all in bets at PokerStars.[/nq]
Okay
[nq:1]I have lost 48% of[/nq]
[nq:2]my all in bets when I was better than a 2-1 favorite[/nq]
For that to have any meaning you'd have to tell us how many of your allin bets you were better than a 2-1 favorite. The total number of allin bets is irrelavant here.
Because you didn't seem to realize this on your own, I wouldn't put a lot of trust into any of your analysis, including your data collection.

Gary Carson
http://garycarson.com

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

bobpaycheck:

it's not the random card generator, it's the large number of idiots who call all-in with the J6o and hit. welcome to the internet in the post-moneymaker era of poker. spike city. get used to it.
[nq:2]I have documented over 200 all in bets at PokerStars.[/nq]
[nq:1]There are some articles about poker site integrity at the Online Poker FAQ: Can you trust the shuffle? http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/fair-shuffle.html Conspiracy theories http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/conspiracy.html Player cheating http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/cheating.html Toad Online Poker FAQ - http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com [/nq]
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Lasher:

I got all nervous after reading your post.
I checked my ALL-IN bets.
I have won 52% of them.
Most of the time I go all in a 2-1 or 3-1 underdog. My favorite hand is J6s or 7/10s.
I hope that helps.

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Lucas Ford:

[nq:1]just call me the new RIVERLOSER on Pokerstars because i get bounced out of more SNGs on the river than anybody i know (with the best hand).[/nq]
You're getting bounced out of tourneys on the river with the best hand? I just hate when that happens.

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

duh:

Uhh..here's how it works..if you don't win the money, you don't have the best hand.
The very best hand we call it "the nuts"..and you can't lose on the river with it.
Now, the nuts can change throughout a hand, so if you're all in with a hand before the flop with the "nuts" and you lose later in the hand, the actual lesson is "don't go all in so much".
You're like those guys who whine about getting their AK cracked by a pair of fours after they've gone all in before the flop..duh.

The deal is that the odd's aren't a guranteed affair. AA getting cracked by a pair of said fours with their friends the pair of treys happens all the time, and always will..remember, two pair beat a pair, even if they're AA.
If your natural response to this post is to tell me to F K off, just remind me where you play, and your handle..just so I can drop by and say "HI"

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Jim Williams:

[nq:1]I have documented over 200 all in bets at PokerStars. I have lost 48% of my all in bets when I was better than a 2-1 favorite and in many instances[/nq]
The odds you quote are long term. 200 instances if not really very long term. Keep on recording and let us know when it gets to several thousand.

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

Henry Estes:

[nq:1]The deal is that the odd's aren't a guranteed affair. AA getting cracked by a pair of said fours[/nq]
"Funny you should mention that" (to paraphrase Jimmy Buffet)

I had AsAd all-in vs 4c4d with a board of AcJc3c4h7c. I was thinking, as the hand was unfolding, that if I held the pocket 4's the software is really teasing me (until the river). A four-flush on the flop, an additional out on the turn, them ...
hpestes receiving mail via hot mail dot com

This thread originates from within 'usenet', and as such the content and users are not guaranteed to have been moderated by our community.

RE: PokerStars!!! Corrupt? page 2

Related forum topics: